| The Impact of the Flood: The Broken Deep There are many questions about the conditions in the world today that the Bible does not seem to answer at first glance. Well, maybe even many glances. Deeper study reveals clues hidden in God's Word that help to provide answers for many questions that have never been adequately answered. The earth and heavens provide the evidence that turns those clues in the Bible into a much better picture of how we got here, where we are going, and how we are going to get there. But in order to do this, we need to erase the falsehoods that have scrambled our brains and begin with a clean slate. Many tall tales were taught to us as fact, so it is not a mystery why so many today are perplexed about our current state of affairs. The truth is not nearly as esoteric or complex as what we have been told about our origins or the Great Global Deluge that has left its imprint all over the earth. For instance, if God created the heavens and the earth, and upon completion of His works He pronounced everything "very good", then why are there so many "natural disasters" that wreak havoc on civilization? Why do we need to be concerned with even the possibility of an asteroid or a meteor hitting the earth? Why do earthquakes strike in one place after another? Or devastating hurricanes, cyclones, tsunamis, floods, tornadoes, or even lightning? Why did fearsome, gruesome, diabolically bloodthirsty dinosaurs at one time dominate the earth? Was God kidding when he said it was all "very good'? Was it like this from the beginning, or did something happen between then and now that causes all these "natural" occurrences? (The ones not caused by H.A.A.R.P., micro-nukes, mini-nukes, particle beam weapons, ULF weapons, or anything else being cooked up in the Pentagon's Radical And Diabolical Science/Weapons Wing called "DARPA".) The key lies in the answer to a question that the Bible leaves no guessing about: What Triggered the Flood? We have been taught a few fairy tales about this question. The Bible says that the Great Deluge caused the top of the highest mountain on the earth to be buried beneath fifteen cubits of water. (Genesis 7:20) One theory that was proposed was that the water that deluged the earth came from a "water canopy" that was described in Genesis 1:7 as the "waters that should be above the heavens". This theory was first proposed by Isaac Vail in 1874, but it has since been shown that it does not "hold any water". We begin at Genesis 1:2- "and darkness was upon the face of the deep." The Hebrew/Aramaic word for deep: 8415 thowm teh-home' or thom {teh-home'}; (usually feminine) from 1949; an abyss (as a surging mass of water), especially the deep (the main sea or the subterranean water-supply):--deep (place), depth. 1949 huwm hoom a primitive root (Compare 2000); to make an uproar, or agitate greatly:--destroy, move, make a noise, put, ring again. In the account of the Master Worker, we read at Proverbs 8:28: "when he strengthened the fountains of the deep." When the deluge was triggered, Genesis 7:11 says: "In the six hundredth year of Noah's life, in the second month, the seventeenth day of the month, the same day were all the fountains of the great deep broken up, and the windows of heaven were opened." So we see that when the world was founded, the "deep" or "abyss" of waters was "strengthened". Other versions render it "heavily charged with water". This means water pressure, and this pressurized water was released by "breaking open" the "fountains" of the great deep. What does a fountain do? It sprays pressurized water vertically. If the pressure was strong enough, the fountains would reach high enough into the atmosphere to trigger immediate rain. But imagine that the force of these fountains goes way beyond just the atmosphere. This is where Dr. Walt Brown's Hydroplate Theory makes a lot of sense. It answers an awful lot of questions that were never answered with anything except the usual Kabbalah mystical explanations, based on the standard wild assumptions that are neither observable nor repeatable in a laboratory. These "fountains" may very well have jettisoned huge chunks of the insides of the earth out into space where they became all the debris that we see flying around out there. No wonder they are in awe when they find meteors in Antarctica or Australia that they think came from Mars! (Or perhaps this is just what they decide to dish out, I still haven't figured out whether or not these wizards actually believe all the science fiction that they foist upon us.) They were shot out towards Mars and found their way back! In addition, they would have us believe that these rocks flying around are so huge and abundant, that they cause all the craters we see on the moon and all the planets, while observable/repeatable experiments suggest that they are caused by electrical discharges from the electrified plasma! It should also be noted that the geshem rain fell for 40 days and 40 nights, but the waters continued to rise for 150 days! (Gen. 7:24) This would lead us to the sensible conclusion that the waters were powerful enough to jettison into the atmosphere for the first 40 days, but then subsided so that the waters kept rising but the rain ceased. Did it rain before the flood? Genesis 2:5,6 says: "And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and there was not a man to till the ground. But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground." The word in this verse for rain is: 4305 matar maw-tar' a primitive root; to rain:--(cause to) rain (upon). But at Genesis 7:12, where it says "and the rain was upon the earth forty days and forty nights", we see a different word for rain: 1653 geshem gheh'-shem from 1652; a shower:--rain, shower. Then we look at the root word and it says: 1652 gasham gaw-sham' a primitive root; to shower violently:--(cause to) rain. So here we have a "violent" rain, versus a soft, misty rain described in Genesis 2:5. Now we need to take a look at what causes rain today, versus how the mist was formed before the flood, and for this we will need to consult an expert. Dr. Walt Brown, in his online book "Creation Science" says: "Heavy condensation before each sunrise kept moisture closer to the ground and restricted high-cloud formation. Today, morning fog evaporates soon after sunrise, before the moisture can settle to the ground. With fewer, if any, high clouds before the flood, temperatures dropped more rapidly at night. This, coupled with more moisture in the daytime air, allowed water droplets to grow larger, settle to the ground faster, and be absorbed by the soil before morning evaporation could begin." "The second difference caused pre-flood fog droplets to grow even faster and larger. Without today’s main sources of condensation nuclei (volcanic debris, sulfur compounds from volcanoes, man-made pollutants, lightning-produced fires, sea salt from ocean spray, or dust kicked up by high winds) there were fewer condensation nuclei. Condensing more moisture on fewer nuclei meant fog droplets grew larger and settled faster." This would explain several things. If the first rainbow appeared "in the cloud" (Gen. 9:13) and this is also the first mention of a cloud, suggesting it did not rain from clouds before the flood. It wasn't necessary in order to sufficiently water the earth. Let's go back to Dr. Brown and see what he has to say: "Condensation Nuclei. Water droplets almost always begin with water vapor condensing on a solid surface. A common example is early-morning dew that collects on grass. Raindrops, snowflakes, and fog particles begin growing on microscopic particles carried in the air. These particles, called condensation nuclei, are typically 0.001–0.0001 millimeters in diameter—less than one hundredth the diameter of a human hair. Each cubic inch of air we breathe contains at least 1,000 such particles. Water vapor molecules rarely collide and stick together; instead, a water droplet forms when trillions of water molecules collect on a microscopic particle." "Wind. Atmospheric temperature differences cause wind, which then mixes air that has different temperatures and moisture contents. The various “mixtures” give us weather: rain, snow, hail, hurricanes, tornadoes, droughts, fair weather, etc. Without today’s major mountains, ice sheets, volcanoes, and vast oceans,2 the preflood earth had more uniform temperatures. Also, abundant vegetation moderated temperatures by evaporative cooling during the day and condensation and heating at night. More uniform temperatures meant less wind and weather extremes." "If a water molecule were the size of a ping-pong ball, a condensation nucleus would be a house-size “rock” and a raindrop would be 100 miles in diameter. When a gaseous water molecule strikes that “rock,” much of the molecule’s energy is transferred to the “rock” as heat. If a somewhat “absorbent rock” is cold enough and the humidity is high enough, the molecule will stick; condensation will begin, and a raindrop will start to grow. The “rock,” slightly warmer because of the added energy from colliding water molecules, will warm the surrounding air, causing slight updrafts. Moist breezes plus updrafts would bring enough moisture to “the rock” for it to grow into a water droplet." "That “rock” and its attached water cannot “float” in calm air for long, just as a grain of sand cannot float in still water. Only wind can suspend condensation nuclei, just as only a swift stream can suspend a sand particle. With less preflood wind, condensation nuclei would receive less lift and stay closer to the ground. With more uniform temperatures globally, less air would rise over warmer areas—again, keeping nuclei and moisture closer to the ground. High clouds may not have existed." "Once water began collecting on nuclei near the ground, the heat of condensation warmed adjacent air, causing it to rise. A microscopic droplet has a large cross-sectional area relative to its volume, so rising, moist air carried the tiny droplet upward. As it rapidly grew, its weight increased faster than its cross-sectional area, so it quickly settled to the earth and often collected other droplets in its path. We could describe this as fog rising from the earth and then settling back to water the ground before rain could form. (Sounds like Genesis 2:5–6, doesn’t it?) It would be similar to morning fog rising on a still lake, but with two differences. First, without polar ice and snow- capped mountains before the flood, less solar radiation reflected back into space, so more of the Sun’s rays heated the earth during the day. With more forests, few (if any) clouds, and slightly longer days, the earth absorbed even more solar energy. Consequently, more water evaporated each day. At night, fewer clouds and longer nights allowed more heat to escape into space, causing more water to condense. (Today, clouds reflect back into space 20–25% of the incoming radiation and hold in much of the earth’s outgoing radiation.) Therefore, the preflood earth was watered more abundantly and uniformly by daily condensation than by rain today. Furthermore, watering occurred at daily intervals. Unlike today, there were no long dry spells or wet spells, droughts or local floods." Breaking open the watery deep brought semi-permanent changes: We say "semi-permanent" because God has promised a new earth to fix this old earth that is no longer the perfectly balanced environment it was when He pronounced it "very good". We must look at the evidence and draw our conclusions based on what we observe, according to the way that God says He caused the flood. What we observe from archaeological evidence is that animals, dinosaurs and migratory peoples were able to move between areas that are now separated by seas. Many people have been led to believe that the story of Pangea explains this, but it does not. Pangea has now been shown to have many problems. The continents do not fit together, as we were told, without further inspection. There are also numerous problems with the idea that continents are sliding around on tectonic plates causing our earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. How is it possible that forests have been found buried underneath the polar ice caps? How did whoever drew the Piri Reis Maps know the topography of Antarctica approximately 4,000 years ago? Another problem that scientists cannot explain is the immense size of some of the dinosaurs and how they were able to support themselves without being crushed to death by their own weight. This is one of those occasions when we have to take everything we have been taught and throw it out the window. That includes the explanation we have been given for gravity, and we also need to seriously question whether or not the earth could be hollow inside. In fact, the only explanation for all these questions is that not only is the earth hollow, but it is growing! If you haven't bolted from this page yet, you do have an open mind, so you might find what follows to be amazing. Let's watch a short video that demonstrates that the earth is indeed growing, indisputably! Look at the evidence for yourself, but just try to ignore any mention of "200 million years", picture it happening much more rapidly, and then we will get right back to putting all these pieces to the puzzle together! Courtesy of Neal Adams, copyright 2006: Did you notice the stretch marks across the entire eastern Pacific? Rather than this taking place 200 million years ago, could it have been the result of breaking open the Mid-Atlantic Rift and the rift of the Pacific Rim, now known as the "Ring of Fire"? The Bible never does mention that these cracks were ever repaired, and the evidence indicates that the earth is growing! Think of a balloon as it expands: the electromagnetic forces from the rotating dense plasma keep the earth's crust "suspended" in its spherical shape, while the continents remain the same size, and the highest mountains are formed as a result of the thick crust flattening out. When earthquakes happen, it's because of growing pains! If you go to Neal's website above, you will see other videos that demonstrate that the same phenomenon is taking place on the other planets in our solar system. The likelihood is that the electromagnetic forces that govern the cosmos were increased when the flood happened. That means that the flood was a universal event, fittingly, because the earth is the center of the universe, and the universe exists for the purpose of the earth. At this point you are either rapt up in this or you are laughing. The punch line is, what's truly laughable is what the falsely so-called "science" establishment throws on our little desks from the days of our youth! So you think that Copernicanism is a certified fact? Those same textbooks are also the ones that told us we came from chimpanzees! The Apostle Peter certainly knew about the earth's geological structure. He said: "For this they willfully forget, that there were heavens from of old, and an earth compacted out of water and amidst water, by the word of God." (2 Peter 3:5, ASV) Notice the past tense, that Peter uses the word "were"..."an earth compacted, or pressurized, but standing "out of the water", while still being "in the midst of water"! Peter just summed up paragraphs of explanations in one sentence! The Earth is "Divided in the Days of Peleg" "And unto Eber were born two sons: the name of one was Peleg; for in his days was the earth divided; and his brother's name was Joktan." -Genesis 10:25 Peleg lived a few hundred years after the flood, and the Bible has little to say about him. Some scholars have interpreted this passage to mean that the earth was divided by means of languages. The Aramaic word for "earth" is erets. Strong's says: 776 'erets eh'-rets from an unused root probably meaning to be firm; the earth (at large, or partitively a land):--X common, country, earth, field, ground, land, X natins, way, + wilderness, world. So it was the land that was divided, not peoples or languages. The above video shows exactly how the land could have been divided shortly after the flood. It also shows that the archaeological evidence indicates that this happened relatively quickly (even on a time scale of hundreds of millions of years) around the time that the dinosaurs disappeared. It would make sense that when the watery deeps were first broken open, the initial expansion of the ocean floors would be rapid, and then gradually start slowing down. As the video also shows, continental plates do not move around, they separate from each other due to the expanding oceanic floor, and there is no subduction. To open up the spaces we see on the ocean floor spreads by means of the tectonic plate theory would do indescribable violence to the earth, even if it happened over a few thousand years. The spreading seen in the video, on the other hand, would hardly cause cataclysmic upheaval. Earthquakes, perhaps, but not massive destruction. The spreading of the ocean floors also allowed the sea level to go down, and would cause the type of rapid water runoff that carved out monuments like the Grand Canyon. Genesis 8:1 says: "and God made a wind to pass over the earth, and the waters subsided." (Darby) Was this just an ordinary wind? Let's look at some of the possible meanings and apply it to the context: H7307 רוּח rûach roo'-akh From H7306; wind; by resemblance breath, that is, a sensible (or even violent) exhalation; figuratively life, anger, unsubstantiality; by extension a region of the sky; by resemblance spirit, but only of a rational being (including its expression and functions): - air, anger, blast, breath, X cool, courage, mind, X quarter, X side, spirit ([-ual]), tempest, X vain, ([whirl-]) wind (-y). What is the context? One in which the earth is being "patched up" in order to make it habitable again, although with an ecosystem far different from the one Ehyeh originally installed. Serious rearrangement of the earth's crust and ocean floors was necessary in order to drain off thousands of feet of water from around the entire globe, in a matter of a few months. And still, nearly 73 percent of the earth's surface remains covered by water to this day! There are other indications that the dividing in Peleg's Day was caused by water. Dr. Brown states: The Bible uses the Hebrew word peleg as a verb three times. Two usages, mentioned above, are translated simply as divided (Genesis 10:25 and I Chronicles 1:19). The third use is a division by water (Job 38:25). In the ten instances where peleg is a common noun, it always involves water. The New American Standard Bible translates it eight times as “streams,” once as “stream,” and once as “channels.” Therefore, peleg may imply a division by water. In English, we have the words archipelago (a sea having, or dividing, many islands) and pelagic (relating to or living in the sea). Pelagic sediments or deposits are sediments on the ocean floor. Pelagic frequently refers to life forms found in the sea. Bathypelagic means relating to or living in the deep sea. Also, the prefix pelag means sea. Dr. Bernard Northrup, a Hebrew professor, has shown that peleg originally meant division by water. That meaning is embedded in all three language families of Noah’s offspring. Consequently, its meaning probably preceded the multiplication of languages at Babel. Northrup states: "[Peleg, palag, or PLG] often contains within it a reference to water. It is used to refer to a stream of water in Hebrew, Coptic, Ethiopic and in Greek. The root is used to refer to irrigation canals which carried the water throughout the farming land of Mesopotamia. However, an examination of the Greek usage (of the family of Japeth [one of Noah’s three sons]) of the root letters PL and PLG clearly shows that in the majority of the instances this root was used of the ocean. ... It is used to mean: “to form a sea or lake,” “of places that are flooded and under water,” “of crossing the sea,” of “the broad sea” itself, of “being out at sea,” “on the open sea.” It is used of seamen and ships. The noun with the result suffix is used of “an inundation.” I continue: it is used of “a being at sea,” of “a creature of or on the sea,” of “one who walks on the sea,” of “running or sailing on the open sea,” of “a harbor that is formed in the open sea by means of sandbags,” and in many ways of “the open sea itself,” of “going to, into or toward the sea,” of “roving through the sea,” of “being sea-nourished,” of “turning something into the sea or into the sea or of flooding.” It is quite apparent that every Greek usage here involves the sea in someway." The Young Earth A significantly smaller earth would have reduced the force of gravity proportionately. Now it can be understood how the dinosaurs like the Brachiosaurus could have supported its immense density while still getting around rather quickly. It also explains how the T-Rex could have run 25-30 mph. No to mention those dragonflies the size of Black Hawk helicopters! T-Rex Soft Tissue Found Tissue fragments from a Tyrannosaurus Rex femur are shown at left, when it is flexible and resilient and when stretched (arrow) returns to its original shape. The middle photo shows the bone after it is air dried. The photo at right shows regions of bone showing fibrous character, not normally seen in fossil bone. If you believe that soft tissue like this can survive 70 million years, you're probably among the laughing. What about "carbon dating", you might ask? That is also built on false assumptions based on Uniformitarianism, which states that current geologic processes, occurring at the same rates observed today, in the same manner, account for all of Earth's geological features. Thus, it assumes that geological processes are essentially unchanged today from those of the unobservable past, and that there have been no cataclysmic events in the earth's history. As present processes are thought to explain all past events, the Uniformitarian slogan is, "the present is the key to the past." Uniformitarianism is defined in the authoritative Glossary of Geology as "the fundamental principle or doctrine that geologic processes and natural laws now operating to modify the Earth's crust have acted in the same regular manner and with essentially the same intensity throughout geologic time, and that past geologic events can be explained by phenomena and forces observable today; the classical concept that 'the present is the key to the past'." -Robert Bates and Julia Jackson, Glossary of Geology, 2nd edition, American Geological Institute, 1980, pg. 677. Mainstream scientists of the Darwin and Lyell (Kabbalah) mindset artfully contrive the earth's history according to the Darwinian time line. They cannot tell us what caused the Ice Age, nor how vast sedimentary layers, stacked like pancakes, grading into each other, with billions of creatures entombed therein, ended up on the continents. Neither can they explain soft dinosaur tissue discovered in allegedly 65 million year-old old rocks, nor how the tenth chapter of Genesis correctly recorded the etymologies of the ancient people groups. They cannot tell us why carbon 14, with a half-life of five thousand years, is found in coal, diamonds, and oil, which are supposedly hundreds of millions of years old. Why a Global Flood? If it wasn't for the flood, the human race would be extinct today. Rebellious angels took human bodies for themselves and began intermingling and breeding with the daughters of men. Their freakish offspring were called the "Nephilim", giant "fellers" who terrorized everyone. They even violated birds and beasts and reptiles and fish! That includes DNA manipulation that produced freakish animals as well as humans! The Book of Enoch (quoted by Jude and others) tells us: "And all the others together with them took unto themselves wives, and each chose for himself one, and they began to go in unto them and to defile themselves with them, and they taught them charms and enchantments, and the cutting of roots, and made them acquainted with plants. And they became pregnant, and they bare great giants, whose height was three thousand ells: Who consumed all the acquisitions of men. And when men could no longer sustain them, the giants turned against them and devoured mankind. And they began to sin against birds, and beasts, and reptiles, and fish, and to devour one another's flesh, and drink the blood. Then the earth laid accusation against the lawless ones." -Enoch 7:1-6. Three thousand ells....let's see now....on the University of North Carolina website we read: "The word comes from the Latin ulna, which originally meant the elbow and is now the name of the bone on the outside of the forearm. The history of the unit is not clear. Some authorities believe the ell was originally a double forearm length, that is, 2 cubits or 36 inches, the same length as a yard. The ell and the yard do seem to be identified in some medieval documents, with ulna being used for both, and in Scotland the ell was equal to 37 Scots inches..." Just below that, under "elle" we read: "a traditional unit of distance in German speaking countries. The elle varied considerably, but it was always shorter than the English ell or French aune. A typical value in northern Germany was exactly 2 fuss (German feet), which would be close to 24 inches or 60 centimeters." Even at 22 inches, 3,000 "ells" would be in the ballpark of 5,600 feet. This has been used to discredit and discard the entire book of Enoch as uninspired. Since the history of the "ell" is not clear, who knows what it meant at the time Enoch was written, or what metamorphosis took place in the meaning of the word by the time it became a "double fore-arm's length"? But aside from the Nephilim, what about the animals? Have you ever wondered why God would create something like this? If you can imagine this huge beast, fifteen feet tall with the remains of rotting flesh between it's teeth, every time it's mouth opened a foul acrid smell would have been emitted. Although we created a true to life aroma, the smell was so authentic that it was considered too sickly for the public to withstand. "We were asked, instead, to create the smell of the environment that the creature occupied. With advice we created a boggy, swampy type smell with just a slight touch of the creature's breath. This aroma was selected for the exhibition." (Note: The above picture of T-Rex and the inset photo are not from the exhibit.) "And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth Me that I have made them." (Genesis 6:7) Why would God say that He regretted His own creation? Adam and Eve sinned, the demons were mutating DNA to produce giant half-human half-demon offspring, but what did the animals do wrong? God's genetic laws as outlined in the first chapter of Genesis were being violated with regard to the animals too! Every creature was commanded to multiply after it's own kind, as God had originally fixed its genetic makeup. This included everything on the earth, both man and beast. Not only did the fallen angels corrupt human DNA, but the animal kingdom too! In the meantime, as Satan's lies teach us, it was God who created these beasts, who had nothing better to do than to stand around and watch them "evolve" for hundreds of millions of years, and when He was finished playing with them, decided to let an asteroid or meteor hit the earth and wipe them out. Surely God has created some fearsome beasts. In the 41st chapter of Job, we read of the great sea monster Leviathan. But Leviathan was just that, a sea creature, and was no threat to land dwellers. Is it beginning to make sense, that the dinosaurs were corrupted reptile hybrids created by the fallen angels/demons now in Tartarus, and were part of the reason why mankind was threatened with extinction? If all creation was 6,000 years ago (which the Bible says it was), that means that the dinosaurs were living side by side with man before the flood, but they were not present when Adam and Eve were created. That means that God didn't create them! Aside from the fearsome and diabolical carnivores like the T-Rex, why would God feel a need to create a 150-foot long beast like Bruhathkayosaurus or Sauroposeidon, weighing in at up to 250 tons, that did nothing but wipe out all the vegetation (and create a serious overabundance of fertilizer)? People have most likely always been fixated with dinosaurs, but the natural progression in Satan's world is into the realm of fire-breathing dragons, closely connected with demons. They are the subject of films, children's books, and video games. On the left below is a demonic T-rex (as if they weren't already) for children that you can find on e-Bay, and on the right, a postage stamp: Be convinced only by God's true Word the Holy Bible. But that includes other writings that Constantine & Friends did not want to be included in YOUR Bible and were left out, like the Book of Enoch, endorsed and quoted by the Lord's brother Jude, and also confirmed by non-canonical writings. At freejesus.net we read: 1. God's angels came to earth and took themselves wives from the daughters of men (mankind). 2. The offspring of the fallen Angels and the daughters of men, The Anakim Giants, "created" in the same manner all kinds of "Strange Creatures", 3. They had the knowledge from their "Fathers" the Fallen Angels to create what ever they liked and so were born the most "Strangest & Most Corrupted Creatures" that ever existed on Earth. Josephus, the Jewish historian, wrote in Book 1, chapter 3 line 73: "...for many angels of God accompanied with women, and begat sons that proved unjust and despisers of all that was good." The Book of Enoch (from a manuscript found in Ethiopia in 1768 by James Bruce, not to be confused with recent books such as Enoch from The Lost Books of the Bible; Keys of Enoch; or The Secrets of Enoch) gives an account of God sending a message to the Fallen Ones saying: "Wherefore have you forsaken the lofty and holy heaven, which endures forever, and have lain with women; have defiled yourselves with the daughters of men; have taken to yourselves wives; have acted like the sons of the earth, and have begotten giants? You being spiritual, holy, and living a life which is eternal, have polluted yourselves with women; have begotten in carnal blood; have lusted in the blood of men; and have done as those who are flesh and blood do. These however die and perish. Therefore have I given to them wives, that they might cohabit with them; that sons might be born of them, and that this might be transacted upon the earth. But you from the beginning were made spiritual, living a life which is eternal, and not subject to death in all the generations of the world. Therefore I made not wives for you, because being spiritual, your dwelling is in heaven." Book of Jubilees (manuscript found in Ethiopia), Chapter 5: "1 and they bare unto them sons and they were Giants. 2 And lawlessness increased on the earth and all flesh corrupted its way, alike men and cattle and beasts and birds and everything that walks on the earth -all of them corrupted their ways and their orders, and they began to devour each other, and lawlessness increased on the earth and every imagination of the thoughts of all men (was) thus evil continually. 3 And God looked upon the earth, and behold it was corrupt, and all flesh had corrupted its orders, and all that were upon the earth had wrought all manner of evil before His eyes." The Book of Jasher (mentioned in Joshua 10:13 and 2 Samuel 1:18) translated from Hebrew to English in 1840 [Chapter 4:18] says, "And their judges and rulers went to the daughters of men and took their wives by force from their husbands according to their choice, and the sons of men in those days took from the cattle of the earth, the beasts of the field and fowls of the air, and taught the mixture of animals of one species with the other, in order therewith to provoke the Lord; and God saw the whole earth and it was corrupt, for all flesh had corrupted its ways upon earth, all men and all animals." Conclusion Dinosaurs are inculcated into children from their first bedtime stories, and are aggrandized and glorified by Hollywood, television, and books. They are the subject of cute little cartoons, everyone loves Barney and Fred Flintstone's pet dinosaur Dino, and children idolize them ! I was one of them! Yes, Barney and Dino are innocuous, but what happens later? We graduate to the 'Big Boys', horrific monsters as seen in the video game "Dungeons and Dragons". No sooner would the TV Guide arrive that I was looking to see when my favorite fire-breathing dinosaur Godzilla would be on the 4:30 movie. And he was 400 feet tall! After the pilot movie, where Godzilla was mean and nasty, (and died, by the way), he was "resurrected" and became a lovable superhero that wiped out all the bad monsters. How we have been deceived! I never could understand what was the purpose of the largest and nastiest dinosaurs. Evolution puts their demise back to 65 million years ago, but they died in the flood, and now we know that God most likely felt no remorse for not taking them into the ark! That doesn't mean that all the dinosaurs were mutants. The smaller, more docile ones were most likely part of creation. Evidently all the animals were created as herbivores, and it was Azazel and his counterparts that turned the animal kingdom into one of violence and wanton bloodletting. Kabbalah scientists can look at the geological column from now until Kingdom Come and it will not matter. The Great Deluge of Noah and the resultant damage to the earth is something only its Creator can repair, and will repair. In fact, He can make the earth grow to any size He chooses, and He can do it without hurting so much as a fly. Denying that the flood happened by the "science" establishment is merely a blatant denial of overwhelming evidence simply because the Bible says it happened. We can't believe that book of fairy tales, can we? Suddenly it makes sense why the earth would have a capital city named "The New Jerusalem" that's nearly the size of India! _________________________________________________________________ Back to top Home |
| At daleair.com we read: "The Tyrannosaurus Rex exhibition was unveiled at London's Natural History Museum on 17th February 2001. The most advanced robotic dinosaur was presented to the world. However, not content with just showing another replica dinosaur, the museum wanted to capture the authentic smell of the fearsome beast. It wanted the whiff of a killer drenched in the blood of it's prey, reeking of rotten meat and scarred with infected wounds. "Dale Air worked alongside the Natural History Museum to create the Maastrichtian Miasma aroma. We took advice from Dr.Angela O'Connell, the museum's Head of Vertebrate Palaeontology. We first contemplated the pungent smell of the T-Rex's breath. |
