"For we are not as many, which corrupt the word of God: but as of sincerity, but as of God, in the sight of God speak we in Christ." -1 Corinthians 2:17, King James Version. According to Paul, corruptions were already entering the sacred text as he was writing to the Corinthians. If anyone knew that the Word of God was being corrupted, it was Paul! Some versions render the word "corrupt" similarly: (ALT) adulterating; (ASV) corrupting; (Bishops) chop and change; (DRB) adulterating; (EMTV) corrupting; (GW) selling an impure word of God; (Murdock) dilute the word of God; (RV) corrupting the word of God; (Webster) corrupt; (WNT) fraudulent hucksters of God’s Message; (YLT) adulterating the word of God. Other versions deceptively conceal the thought of "corruption": (BBE) For we are not like the great number who make use of the word of God for profit: (CEV) A lot of people try to get rich from preaching God's message. (Darby) For we do not, as the many, make a trade of the word of God; (ESV) For we are not, like so many, peddlers of God's word, (Geneva) For wee are not as many, which make marchandise of the woorde of God: (GNB) We are not like so many others, who handle God's message as if it were cheap merchandise; (ISV) At least we are not commercializing God's word like so many others. (NWT) [We are;] for we are not peddlers of the word of God as many men are According to Strong's Concordance: kapeleuo from kapelos (a huckster); to retail, that is, (by implication) to adulterate (figuratively): - corrupt. This is one of thousands of scriptures that vary to all degrees in different translations. But is it really that complicated? No it is not. There are basically two streams of Bibles today, those from the Received (Majority) Text, or "Textus Recepticus", from which much (but not all) of the Authorized King James Bible is taken, and the Minority Text which comes from scrolls found in Egypt, the Vatican Library, and a cave on Mount Sinai. I am not a "King James Only" advocate. It's title "Authorized Version" does not mean that it is especially authorized by God. It was translated at the order of an autonomous ruler who did not want terms like "servant", "attendant" or "helper" in it, but rather "minister"; not "congregation" but "church". He wished to establish a hierarchy, for control, that the Bible does not teach. What Jesus taught was that the greatest among his disciples would be the "least" ones, the most humble. These things are cause for concern, but what really should concern us the most with the "revised" Bibles is the omissions having to do with salvation doctrines. Aside from omitting nearly ten percent of the text, blatant doctrinal changes have been made, and many of the changes are subtle. But think of it this way: If we plot a course for a ship going on a long journey to a specific destination, and little changes are made here and there, we just may end up thousands of miles from our target destination! The bitter truth that we must face is that we have no text that dates prior to the fourth century, so we have a period of more than 300 years when ALL texts may have been corrupted by those who had certain beliefs, for instance, in a Gnostic Trinity, or that Hell was a literal place of eternal torture. Considering all the contradictions that exist even in the Received Text, interpolations definitely took place. Not only that, but it was the Roman Empire that had the final say on which books belonged in the Bible, and the original 12 Apostles who had the real authority from Jesus (not including Paul) had nothing to do with it! "How is it that you say, We are wise and the law of the Lord is with us? But see, the false pen of the scribes has made it false. " -Jeremiah 8:8, BBE. Rest assured though, in spite of the fact that genuine writings such as the books of Enoch and Jasher, confirmed in authenticity by qualified Bible writers such as Moses and Jude, we certainly have enough of God's inspired Word to get us to the approaching period of Divine Enlightenment promised through the Holy Spirit of God. Ultimately it was the Catholic Church that decided what books were in their best interests, but that's why we are commanded to test ALL the "inspired expressions", even if they appear in the Bible! Early Gnostic Heretics Aside from Saul/Paul himself, in the book of Acts we read of a man, a Jewish mystic named Simon Magus. Chapter 8 verses 9,10 says: "But there was a certain man, called Simon, which beforetime in the same city used sorcery, and bewitched the people of Samaria, giving out that himself was some great one: To whom they all gave heed, from the least to the greatest, saying, This man is the great power of God." Here we see that a Kabbalist Jewish sorcerer was already being worshiped as "god" in the first century. He was corrupting Christianity with gnostic doctrines and even tried to buy his way into being an Apostle. In verses 18-23 we read: "And when Simon saw that through laying on of the apostles' hands the Holy Ghost was given, he offered them money, Saying, Give me also this power, that on whomsoever I lay hands, he may receive the Holy Ghost. But Peter said unto him, Thy money perish with thee, because thou hast thought that the gift of God may be purchased with money. Thou hast neither part nor lot in this matter: for thy heart is not right in the sight of God. Repent therefore of this thy wickedness, and pray God, if perhaps the thought of thine heart may be forgiven thee. For I perceive that thou art in the gall of bitterness, and in the bond of iniquity." Given the solid foundation of Saul of Tarsus, it was men like Simon Magus, Philo of Alexandria, Valentinus and many others who injected the Gnostic teachings of the Pharisees into Christian doctrines, and these would later become the dogma of the Catholic Church. As copies of the New Testament were being made during the first three centuries, errors were creeping into the sacred text, and those errors came from scribes who were influenced by Gnosticism, which essentially comes from the secret oral tradition of the Pharisees. These false doctrines not only plagued the early congregations, but they are still with us today, in modern form, in many contemporary Christian cults. This is what influenced the transmission of scripture and accounts for most of the differences in the line of manuscripts. Older is Not Better If Satan was going to corrupt God’s Word, it stands to reason that he would do it in a very crafty and deceptive way. What would be more ingenious than to have corrupted Bibles written as early as the fourth century, hide them in caves or monasteries, to be “discovered” more than a thousand years later as being the "oldest" (and therefore the most "reliable") copies of the ancient manuscripts ever found? We will find out that is exactly what happened! “We need to understand that many of the new translations are taken from old manuscripts. People think that these are more reliable. In actual fact they are saying that a manuscript found in a waste paper basket in a cave in Mt. Sinai and questionable manuscripts from Alexandria in Egypt, are more reliable than the Received Text.” –Les Garrett, 1982. “Which Bible can we trust?” Christian Centre Press p. 15. “Origen, being a textual critic, is supposed to have corrected numerous portions of the sacred manuscripts. Evidence to the contrary shows he changed them to agree with his own human philosophy of mystical and allegorical ideas. Thus, through deceptive scholarship of this kind, certain manuscripts became corrupt.” –p. 16. Origen was praised by Masons as an insider initiate. He believed man was divine. This is the same Humanist religion that Satan invented in the Garden of Eden when he said to Eve: "Ye shall be as gods." From the birth of Christ to 400 AD, Gnostic gospels and other writings were written. This is part of the corruption that Paul was referring to at 2 Corinthians 2:17. In 331 AD, Constantine ordered that an ‘ecumenical Bible’ be written. Eusebius, a follower of Origen, was assigned to direct this task. This Gnostic Bible was written to be acceptable to Pagans and Christians, but the Christians rejected them. They went into secret libraries and stayed there for centuries, later to be dug up as ancient manuscripts. There were about 50 copies made up by Eusebius, and they were distributed and ended up in Rome and Alexandria where the esoteric studies were concentrated. In 1481 AD, The Vatican manuscript was discovered in the Vatican Library. It is thought by some to be one of the surviving manuscripts done by Eusebius at the command of Constantine. The date of its writing coincides with the ‘ecumenical Bible’ of Constantine (just in time to counter the Reformation). Now we must believe that God kept the truth from all generations up until 1481, when the Vatican discovered the right manuscript! In 1844 AD, the Sinaitic manuscript was discovered at Mt. Sinai in the monastery of St. Catherine, and it agrees closely with the Vatican manuscripts. These two manuscripts were probably two of the fifty that were written for Constantine. 1881 AD The Westcott and Hort Greek Text was introduced. This text departed from the Textus Recepticus and follows the Vatican and Sinaitic corruptions. The New World Translation is based on Vatican and Sinai manuscripts, leaning heavily on the Sinai so as not to appear overly Catholic! These corruptions started in the early 1900’s. As late as 1940, Jehovah’s Witnesses had no Bible of their own and were still using the King James Version. They were told to take a pen and modify the King James, crossing out many verses, even entire chapters. “It must be emphasized that the argument is not between an ancient text and a recent one, but between two ancient forms of the text, one of which was rejected and the other adopted and preserved by the Church as a whole and remaining in common use for more than fifteen centuries." –Les Garret 1982. “Which Bible can we trust?” Christian Centre Press p. 46 “Tyndale used the Received Text in his Bible and said to the Pope, “If God spare my life, before many years I will cause a boy that driveth a plough to know more of the Scriptures than Thou doest.” -"God Wrote Only One Bible”, by Jasper James Ray The argument is not one of the King James Version versus other versions, it is the Received Text versus other manuscripts. "The Jesuits were called to help and they said, “We must undermine the Bible of the Protestants and destroy their teachings,”…The Queen of England realizing the damage the Jesuit Bible would do, sent to Europe for Beza, who was with John Calvin, to help….Thomas Cartwright…With one hand he took hold of all the Greek manuscripts and with the other hand he took hold of all the Latin manuscripts form the Received Text, and he hit the Jesuit Bible blow after blow….Finally the Spanish Armada came against England with 136 armed ships, some with 50 cannons…England could only gather thirty ships and these were lead by Sir Francis Drake. Freak storms came down the English channel and the Spanish ships were found wrecked right up to the Scottish coast and England became a great sea power." - Les Garrett p. 60 Jesuit view of the Bible: "Then the Bible, that serpent which with head erect and eyes flashing threatens us with its venom while it trails along the ground, shall be changed into a rod as soon as we are able to seize it….for three centuries past this cruel asp has left us no repose. You well know with what folds it entwines us and with what fangs it gnaws us.” -The Jesuits in History, Hector Macpherson, (Springfield MO: Ozark Book Publishers, 1997;originally published in 1900) Appendix I. Jesuit Catechism: "Q. What if the Holy Scriptures command one thing, the the Pope another contrary to it? A. The Holy Scriptures must be thrown aside. Q. What is the Pope? A. He is the Vicar of Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, and there is but one Judgment-Seat belonging to God and the Pope." -Roy Livesey, 1998, Understanding the New Age: World Government and World Religion -Chichester, England: New Wine Press, p. 104. Freemasonry: Regarding the Bible Albert Pike writes: "…the absurd reading of the established Church, taking literally the figurative, allegorical, and mythical language of a collection of Oriental books of different ages…the folly of regarding the Hebrew books as if they had been written by the unimaginative, hard, practical intellect of the England of James the First and the bigoted stolidity of Scottish Presbyterianism.” Knights Templars: “The better to succeed and win partisans, the Templars sympathized with regrets for dethroned creeds (Pagan Religions) and encouraged the hopes of new worships, promising to all liberty of conscience and a new orthodoxy that should be the synthesis of all the persecuted creeds." -Morals and Dogma, p. 818 Westcott & Hort: "Going back to the time of the early church we find the Coptic Versions, the Latin Versions and Syrian Versions. These Bibles were in circulation before the Vaticanus was written. It is hard to see how God would allow the true text to be hidden in the Vatican library and in a waste paper basket in a cave for one thousand five hundred years and to be brought to the light of day by two Cambridge Professors [Westcott & Hort] who did not even believe in the verbal inspiration of the Scriptures." –“Which Bible” and “True and False”, edited by David Otis Fuller. Corrupt Manuscripts: "How could Helvidius have accused Jerome of employing corrupt Greek manuscripts, if Helvidius had not had the pure Greek manuscripts?" –Les Garrett p. 61. "These revised versions are based on manuscripts from Egypt that were definitely corrupted. Both Augustine and Tertullion testified that the scribes in Africa corrupted and changed the manuscripts." –Christian Handbook of Manuscripts, by Peter S Ruckman, President of the Pensacola Bible Press. The Watchtower & Egypt: In the book “All Scripture is Inspired of God”, by the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society (copyright), in Study Number 6, “The Christian Greek Text of the Holy Scriptures”, page 317, we read: 13 Great quantities of papyrus writings have been located in the province of Faiyum, in Egypt. In the late 19th century, a number of Biblical papyri were brought to light. One of the most important of all modern-day manuscript finds was a discovery made public in 1931. It consisted of parts of 11 codices, containing portions of 8 different books of the inspired Hebrew Scriptures and 15 books of the Christian Greek Scriptures, all in Greek. These papyri range in date of writing from the second century to the fourth century of the Common Era. Much of the Christian Greek Scripture portions of this find are now in the Chester Beatty Collections and are listed as P45, P46, and P47, the symbol “P” standing for “Papyrus.” Hatred for Christ and the Sacred Scriptures widespread: “No sooner,” writes Dean Burgon, “was the work of Evangelists and Apostles recognized as the necessary counterpart and complement of God’s ancient Scriptures and became the New Testament, than a reception was found to be awaiting it in the world closely resembling that which He experienced Who is the subject of its pages. Calumny and misrepresentation, persecution and murderous hate, assailed Him continually.” “And the written Word in like manner, in the earliest age of all, was shamefully handled by mankind. Not only was it confused through human infirmity and misapprehension, but it became also the object of restless malice and unsparing assaults.” -Dean Burgon, "Traditional Text" p.10 Now that we’ve seen that older is not necessarily better, backtracking to paragraph 11 of “All Scripture”, we read: 11 A Reservoir of Over 13,000 Manuscripts. A tremendous fund of manuscript copies of all 27 canonical books is available today. Some of these cover extensive portions of Scripture; others are mere fragments. According to one calculation, there are over 5,000 manuscripts in the original Greek. In addition, there are over 8,000 manuscripts in various other languages—a total exceeding 13,000 manuscripts all together. Dating from the 2nd century C.E. to the 16th century C.E., they all help in determining the true, original text. The oldest of these many manuscripts is the papyrus fragment of the Gospel of John in the John Rylands Library in Manchester, England, known by the number P52, which is dated to the first half of the second century, possibly about 125 C.E. Thus, this copy was written only a quarter of a century or so after the original. When we consider that for ascertaining the text of most classical authors, only a handful of manuscripts are available, and these are seldom within centuries of the original writings, we can appreciate what a wealth of evidence there is to assist in arriving at an authoritative text of the Christian Greek Scriptures. 15 The discoveries of these papyri supply proof that the Bible canon was completed at a very early date. Among the Chester Beatty Papyri, two codices—one binding together parts of the four Gospels and Acts (P45) and another bringing within its covers 9 of the 14 letters of Paul (P46)—show that the inspired Christian Greek Scriptures were assembled shortly after the death of the apostles. Since it would have taken time for these codices to circulate widely and find their way down into Egypt, it is apparent that these Scriptures had been collected into their standard form by the second century, at the latest. Thus, by the end of the second century, there was no question but that the canon of the Christian Greek Scriptures was closed, completing the canon of the entire Bible. Explaining how the way was opened for textual criticism, "All Scripture" continues: 17 Erasmus’ Text. Throughout the long centuries of the Dark Ages, when the Latin language dominated and Western Europe was under the iron control of the Roman Catholic Church, scholarship and learning were at a low ebb. However, with the European invention of printing from movable type in the 15th century and the Reformation of the early 16th century, more freedom prevailed, and there was a rebirth of interest in the Greek language. It was during this early revival of learning that the famous Dutch scholar Desiderius Erasmus produced his first edition of a master Greek text of the “New Testament.” (Such a printed master text is prepared by carefully comparing a number of manuscripts and using the words most generally agreed upon as original, often including, in an apparatus below, notes about any variant readings in some manuscripts.) This first edition was printed in Basel, Switzerland, in 1516, one year before the Reformation started in Germany. The first edition had many errors, but an improved text was presented in succeeding editions in 1519, 1522, 1527, and 1535. Erasmus had only a few late cursive manuscripts available to him for collating and preparing his master text. 18 Erasmus’ refined Greek text became the basis for better translations into several of the Western European languages. This made possible the production of versions superior to those that had been translated previously from the Latin Vulgate. First to use Erasmus’ text was Martin Luther of Germany, who completed his translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures into German in 1522. In the face of much persecution, William Tyndale of England followed with his English translation from Erasmus’ text, completing this while in exile on the continent of Europe in 1525. Antonio Brucioli of Italy translated Erasmus’ text into Italian in 1530. With the advent of Erasmus’ Greek text, there was now opening up an era of textual criticism. Textual criticism is the method used for reconstruction and restoration of the original Bible text. Textual Criticism leads to the Modern Revised Version: In connection with Westcott and Hort’s theory Dean Burgon writes: “We oppose facts to their speculation. They exalt B and Aleph and D because in their own opinions those copies are best. They weave ingenious webs and invent subtle theories, because their paradox of a few against the many requires ingenuity and subtlety for its support. Dr. Hort reveled in finespun theories and technical terms, such as “Intrinsic Probability”, “Transcriptional Probability”, “Internal Evidence of Readings”, “Internal evidence of Documents”, which of course connote a certain amount of evidence, but are weak pillars of a heavy structure…Even conjectural emendation and inconsistent decrees are not rejected. They are infected with the theorizing which spoils some of the best German work, and with the idealism which is the bane of many academic minds especially at Oxford and Cambridge." “In contrast with this sojourn in cloudland, we are essentially of the earth though not earthy. We are nothing if we are not grounded in facts: Our appeal is to facts, our test lies in facts, so far as we can we build testimonies and pile facts on facts. We imitate the procedure of the courts of justice in decisions resulting from the converging product of all evidence, when it has been cross-examined and sifted.” “In the balances of these seven tests of truth and speculations of the Westcott and Hort school, which have bewitched millions are “Tekel”, weighed in the balances and found wanting. “I am utterly disinclined to believe”, continues Burgon, “so grossly improbable does it seem- that at the end of 1800 years 995 copies out of every thousand, suppose, will prove untrustworthy; and that the one, two, three, four or five which remain, whose contents were till yesterday as good as unknown, will be found to have retained the secret of what the Holy Spirit originally inspired.” “What, in the meantime, is to be thought of those blind guides – those deluded ones – who would now, if they could, persuade us to go back to those same codices of which the Church hath already purged herself?” –The Revision Revised p 334-335. "Burgon utterly rejected the claims of Tischendorf (1815-74), Tregelles (1813-75), Westcott (1825-1901), Hort (1828-92), and other contemporary scholars, who insisted that as a result of their labours the true NewTestament text had at last been discovered after having been lost for well-nigh fifteen centuries." “Who but those with Roman Catholic sympathies could ever be pleased with the notion that God preserved the true New Testament text in secret for almost one thousand years and then finally handed it over to the Roman Pontiff for safekeeping?” -Les Garrett p 91,92. Dr. Hoskier quotes the following from Dr. Salmon in his book “Some Thoughts on the Textual Criticism of the New Testament”- “Naturally Hort regarded those manuscripts as most trustworthy which give the readings recognized by Origen, and these no doubt were the readings which in the third century were most preferred at Alexandria. Thus Hort’s method inevitably led to the exclusive adoption of the Alexandrian text.” “You will always be my friend but I can no longer ignore the criticisms. I cannot refute them, and dear brother I have not a thing against you, but the only thing I can do under God is to renounce every attachment to the New American Standard Bible.” -Dr. Frank Logsdon to F. Lockman -quoted in Les Garrett p. 236. The Bible was placed in the "Index of Prohibited Books" by Pope Paul IV in 1599! "The early church at Antioch used the Syrian Bible translated from the Hebrew and Greek and is older than the Masoretic text. The Waldenses had access to these writings and in 1453, when the Turks captured Constantinople, Greek scholars brought their manuscripts to the West." – Septuagint made for Alexandria library in 285 BC, Vulgate 383-405. The Vulgate- The wicked Council of Trent (1545-1563) proposed the Vulgate Latin Bible as the only authentic translation! Pope Sixtus V declared the Vulgate infallible, but in 1592 Pope Clement III ordered a better edition and 2000 changes were made! The assault on God's Word heated up again in the 19th century: 1851 Dec 20th- F. J. A. Hort to John Ellerton: “I had no idea till the last few weeks of the importance of texts, having read so little Greek Testament, and dragged on with the villainous Textus Receptus leaning entirely on late MSS.; it is a blessing there are such early ones.” –Life, Vol. I, p. 211). 1852 April 19th- Hort to Rev. John Ellerton: “One result of our talk I may as well tell you. He (Westcott) and I are going to edit a Greek text of the New Testament some two or three years hence, if possible. Lachmann and Tischendorf will supply rich materials, but not nearly enough; and we hope to do a good deal with Oriental versions. Our object is to supply clergymen generally, schools, etc., with a portable Greek text which shall not be disfigured with Byzantine corruptions.” -Life, Vol. I., p. 250). Sept. 29th- Westcott to Hort: “As to our proposed recension of the New Testament text, our object would be, I suppose, to prepare a text for common and general use…With such an end in view, would it not be best to introduce only certain emendations into the received text, and to note in the margin such as seem likely or noticeable- after Griesbach’s manner?…I feel most keenly the disgrace of circulating what I feel to be falsified copies of Holy Scripture (a reference to the A. V.?) and am most anxious to provide something to replace them. This cannot be any text resting solely on our own judgment, even if we were not too inexperienced to make one; but it must be supported by a clear and obvious preponderance of evidence. The margin will give ample scope for our own integrity or principles…my wish would be to leave the popular received text except where it is clearly wrong.” –Life, Vol.I, p. 228,229. The statement which immediately follows Hort’s describing the sacred text as “Vile” is most revealing: “Westcott, Gorham, C. B. Scott, Benson, Bradshaw, Laurd, etc. and I have started a society for the investigation of ghosts and all supernatural appearances, and effects, being all disposed to believe that such things really exist, and ought to be discriminated from hoaxes and mere subjective delusions; we shall be happy to obtain any good accounts well authenticated with names. Westcott is drawing up a schedule of questions. Cope calls us the ‘Cock and Bull Club;’ our own temporary name is the ‘Ghostly Guild’” -Ibid.,Vol 1, p. 211. “The evolution from traditional medium ship to contemporary channeling has been gradual. The original spiritualism had it’s start in 1848…Organizations like the Society for Psychical Research in Britain were formed…When Russian-born Helena Petrovna Blavatsky founded theosophy in 1875, the slow transition toward modern channeling began…her two chief works, Isis Unveiled, and the Secret Doctrine laid the foundation for the modern New Age belief system.” -Elliot Miller, 1989. Crash Course on the New Age, Baker Book House. Hort a member of a SECRET SOCIETY Yet he found time to attend the meeting of various societies, and in June joined the mysterious company of the ‘Apostles.’ He remained always a grateful and loyal member of the secret Club, which has now [ca. 1896] become famous for the number of distinguished men who have belonged to it. In his time the Club was in a manner reinvigorated, and he was mainly responsible for the wording of the oath which binds the members to a conspiracy of silence…” -The Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort vol. 1 p.170-171. Back to “All Scripture”- pages 318-319: 21 Refined Greek Texts. Later, Greek scholars produced increasingly refined texts. Outstanding was that produced by J. J. Griesbach, who had access to the hundreds of Greek manuscripts that had become available toward the end of the 18th century. The best edition of Griesbach’s entire Greek text was published 1796-1806. His master text was the basis for Sharpe’s English translation in 1840 and is the Greek text printed in The Emphatic Diaglott, first published complete in 1864. Other excellent texts were produced by Konstantin von Tischendorf (1872) and Hermann von Soden (1910), the latter serving as the basis for Moffatt’s English version of 1913. 22 Westcott and Hort Text. A Greek master text that has attained wide acceptance is that produced by the Cambridge University scholars B. F. Westcott and F. J. A. Hort, in 1881. Proofs of Westcott and Hort’s Greek text were consulted by the British Revision Committee, of which Westcott and Hort were members, for their revision of the “New Testament” of 1881. This master text is the one that was used principally in translating the Christian Greek Scriptures into English in the New World Translation. This text is also the foundation for the following translations into English: The Emphasised Bible, the American Standard Version, An American Translation (Smith-Goodspeed), and the Revised Standard Version. This last translation also used Nestle’s text. 23 Nestle’s Greek text (the 18th edition, 1948) was also used by the New World Bible Translation Committee for the purpose of comparison. The committee also referred to those by Catholic Jesuit scholars José M. Bover (1943) and Augustinus Merk (1948). The United Bible Societies text of 1975 and the Nestle-Aland text of 1979 were consulted to update the footnotes of the 1984 Reference Edition. Conclusion There is a clear picture being painted here that fits into a pattern that seems to be repeated over and over. The Kabbalistic, Mithraic, and other Gnostic doctrines that Paul, Simon Magus and many others brought into Christianity were handed down through the Roman Catholic Church, the Mother of the Harlots. The new and revised Bibles have eliminated approximately ten percent of the inspired Word of God, removing many references to doctrines that are rejected by Theosophy, the basis of the approaching One-World Humanist-Communist Religion that teaches that the human race is evolving into divinity. The serpent's lie in the Garden of Eden is as big as ever. Many references related to baptism, repentance, judgment, atonement, forgiveness of sins and salvation have been eliminated. It opens the way for multiple messiahs to come simultaneously for all religions to merge together with the Bahai faith, the New Age religion of the United Nations and the New World Order. The closest religion to this concept is Hinduism. See the related links below for more information. ___________________________________________________________________________________________ Additional resource: "Battle of the Bibles" a video by Walter Veith. Related Links: ____________________________________________________________________________________________ Back to top Home |
| Which Bible Can We Trust? |
